Big Money Fix: Whitman, Koch Brothers
07 September 2010 |permalink | email article
It’s stunning enough that billionaire non-voter and political novice Meg Whitman wants to buy the governor’s office by giving $104 million to her campaign for TV ads, direct mail, a Web presence, scores of outside political consultants and a paid staff of presidential size proportions.
But, overall, Whitman is a pauper compared to the Wichita, Kansas oil company headed by billionaire brothers David and Charles Koch. Their annual revenues are estimated to be a hundred billion dollars and whose combined fortune of thirty-five billion dollars is exceeded only by those of Bill Gates and Warren Buffet.
David Koch, as The New Yorker noted, is part of the family that has repeatedly funded stealth attacks on the federal government, while waging war against President Obama and his administration. Turns out the Kochs, lifetime libertarians whose beliefs include drastically lower personal and corporate taxes, minimal social services for the needy, and much less oversight of industry – notably environmental legislation – have contributed $1 million to the Proposition 23 campaign.
It would suspend California’s landmarks climate change law signed by Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006, or Assembly Bill 32, which aims to reduce carbon emissions to 1990’s level by the end of the decade.
(Mega-millionaire Republican Senate candidate Carly Fiorina, after considerable vacillation, supports Proposition 23; Whitman, facing a more tricky political calculation, is said to be leaning against it.)
Proposition 23 seeks to suspend the law until the statewide employment rate hits 5.5 percent for four quarters in a row – an uncertain reality. Proponents of the climate change law, as the Sacramento Bee reported, say Koch and other oil companies are trying to preserve their profits at the expense of the growing clean-tech industry and health concerns of California residents.
A spokeswoman for Flint Hills Resources, a wholly owned subsidiary of Koch Industries Inc., operates refineries in three states – but not in California. – argues that implementing the law means more job losses and higher energy costs. Supporters of the climate change law, including private investors, have pledged nearly $10 million to defeat Proposition 23. It’s a clear cut voter issue: protect big business interests or public health concerns.
316
Twitter Bytes
Monthly archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
Links
- Calbuzz
- Ron Kaye L.A.
- Cincinnati Beacon
- Talking Points Memo
- Salon
- Andrew Sullivan
- Marc Cooper
- L.A. Observed
- The Angry Anthropologist
- Slate




