Finance: FDR, Bush Blew It
21 November 2008 |permalink | email article
Last Saturday’s G-20 economic gathering in Washington, compared to a rerun of the London Economic Conference in 1933 when 66 nations failed to agree on a concerted response to the Great Depression, drew little media attention.
Harvard historian Niall Ferguson wrote in the Washington Post the fault then lay mostly with the newly elected U.S. president Franklin D. Roosevelt, who vetoed European proposals for currency stabilization. (See “Wall Street Lays Another Egg.” Vanity Fair, December 2008).
This time it was outgoing President George W. Bush, even before his counterparts reached Washington, who made it clear that nothing in the current economic crisis has diminished his faith in free markets or minimalist regulation.
His action doomed European calls for a new international regulatory body. Is that why there were no Bush handshakes with his counterparts?
“As happened in the 1930s, what began as an American banking panic has now escalated into a global economic crisis. And just as it happened in the 1930s, a lack of international coordination has the potential to turn a recession into a deep and protracted depression.”
He writes that the absence of any global coordination as investors react to each fresh national initiative could be nearly as disruptive as the actions of national governments during the Depression, but opines the relationship between China and the U.S. as crucial.
“More than anything else, it has been China’s strategy of dollar reserve accumulation that has financed America’s debt habit. Chinese savings were the key reason U.S. long term interest rates stayed low and the borrowing binge kept going.”
Now that the age of leverage is over, “Chimerica” – the partnership between the big saver and the big spender is over, and what Ferguson sees as a need for the Chinese to be supportive of U.S. monetary easing and fiscal stimulus by doing more of the same themselves.
His advice to Obama: Don’t wait until April for the next G-20 summit. Call a meeting of the Chimerican G-2 for the day after the Jan. 20 inaugural. Don’t wait for China to call its own meeting of the new “G-1” summit in Beijing.
81
Twitter Bytes
Monthly archives
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
Links
- Ron Kaye L.A.
- Cincinnati Beacon
- Talking Points Memo
- Salon
- Andrew Sullivan
- Marc Cooper
- L.A. Observed
- The Angry Anthropologist
- Slate
Syndicate
-
More blogs about joescott3.







-
