Joe Scott: The Body Politic

Hubris?

12 July 2008 |permalink | email article

Andrew Sullivan of The Atlantic, one of the most thoughtful conservatives in the nation who likes Obama, blogs that his campaign could be too cocky for its own good.

Marc Ambinder conducted a survey for The Atlantic.com Poll which rejected Sullivan’s perception:

* 42% disagreed, blaming the media.

* 32% disagreed, blaming trivial lapses.

* 26% agreed with Sullivan.

134

Twitter Bytes

Monthly archives

Syndicate

joescott3

Enter your email address:
Delivered by FeedBurner

Mission Statement

Aristotle's Politics (Book 1, Chapter 1) is clear that "man is a political animal in a greater measure than any bee or any gregarious animal. For nature does nothing without purpose, and man alone of the animals possesses speech."

The blogosphere watches as a divided America reexamines its soul. After 35 years as a journalist I have broken a long silence to comment again on critical moral and political issues that impact the U.S. body politic. Reflections on JoeScott3.com, an independent, non-profit blog, are posted frequently, not daily. I hope global readers, accepting Aristotle's definition of a political animal, will find this quick scan both provocative and mindful.

About Joe Scott

A 1952 graduate of the University of Notre Dame, Joe Scott spent many years as a columnist for the Herald-Examiner (1978-1989), and later the Los Angeles Times and other California dailies.He was the critically-acclaimed editor and publisher of the Political Animal and California Eye, newsletters (1973-1992). He worked as a political consultant and ran several successful political campaigns in California. Joe Scott is a third-generation Angeleno. He is working on a novel about public corruption in Los Angeles during the late 1930's. You can contact Joe Scott here. All content of the site, Joe Scott, 2006

Joe Scott 3: The Body Politic