Politics of Fear
31 December 2007 |permalink | email article
Hillary Clinton, as the Iowa caucuses near, is making an all-out pitch that experience trumps change. She warns voters that she would be the best prepared candidate to deal with “the unpredictable.”
Until this past weekend change was the mantra in the Democratic campaign: Clinton, tough and experienced; Obama, optimist and inspiring; Edwards, angry and populist.
On Saturday, Clinton offered a new definition of change. She mocked Obama and Edwards as the candidates of hope and demand, respectively, describing herself as working very hard every day for 35 years to achieve it.
Bill Clinton in New Hampshire used the same script to offer a fourth reason why his wife should become president: she would be the best able to “deal with the unexpected.”
The first three dealt with vision, plans and experience.
“There is a better than 50% chance that in the first year or 18 months of the next presidency something will happen that is not being discussed in the campaign,” he said.
The New York Times recently reported on the depth of her resume credentials as First Lady: no security clearance, non-attendance at National Security Council meetings, no copy of the president’s daily intelligence briefing.
“During one of President Bill Clinton’s major policy tests on terrorism, whether to bomb Afghanistan and Sudan in 1998, Mrs. Clinton was barely speaking to her husband, let alone advising him, as the Lewinsky scandal sizzled.”
Both Clintons clearly allude to the 9/11 attacks and President Bush’s failure to anticipate them.
The theme of her closing mantra is deceivingly simplistic: “Big Problems, Big Solutions – Time to Pick a President.”
But the subliminal translation to voters, in effect, is starkly reminiscent of 2004 Republican fear tactics: “Be afraid and trust Hillary.”
The Washington Post noted that “it is the type of election strategy most often adopted by incumbent candidates.”
The reference recalled Dick Cheney’s bold warning of the consequences of a John Kerry election in protecting national security against terrorism.
535
Twitter Bytes
Monthly archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
Links
- Calbuzz
- Ron Kaye L.A.
- Cincinnati Beacon
- Talking Points Memo
- Salon
- Andrew Sullivan
- Marc Cooper
- L.A. Observed
- The Angry Anthropologist
- Slate




