PR War Room
29 August 2007 |permalink | email article
The Pentagon, anticipating next month’s visit by Gen. David Petraeus to Washington to describe alleged military progress in Iraq, is launching a massive public relations offensive.
In a memo circulated last week, The Associated Press reported that Dorrance Smith, assistant secretary for public affairs, seeks personnel for what he described as a high-priority effort to distribute Defense Department information on Iraq.
The Pentagon dismissed suggestions that the communications desk would be propaganda tool, insisting the war room is being established to gather and distribute information in a more efficient and timely manner.
I read a stunning Washington Post story this week about Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), an outspoken liberal making her first visit to Iraq this month. Resolving to keep her opinions to herself she decided “I would listen and learn” along with other lawmakers in briefings with Petraeus and other military leaders.
Over lunch she carefully jotted down Petraeus’s words in a small white notebook: “We will be in Iraq in some way for 10 years.” She added her own translation: “Keep the trains running for a few months, then stretch it out. Just enough progress to justify more time.”
Schakowsky added: “I felt that was a stretch and really a PR strategy – just like the PR strategy that initially led up to the war in the first place.
Petraeus, she said, “acknowledged that if the policymakers decide that we need to withdraw, that, you know, that’s what he would have to do. But he felt that in order to win, we’d have to be there for nine or ten years.”
She acknowledged that the military’s presentation may have been effective. “I you took the briefings at their face value, without context, without bringing anything to it – clearly they were trying to present that positive spin.”
She didn’t respond to Petraeus; she let the comment drift by. “I was not arguing,” she said. ”I wanted to see what his take was.”
If this account foreshadows the Petraeus White House report, look for a massive political outcry to approach anti-Vietnam war proportions.
664
Twitter Bytes
Monthly archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
Links
- Calbuzz
- Ron Kaye L.A.
- Cincinnati Beacon
- Talking Points Memo
- Salon
- Andrew Sullivan
- Marc Cooper
- L.A. Observed
- The Angry Anthropologist
- Slate




