Sarah Palin: political and personal
01 July 2009 |permalink | email article
The 9,800-word piece by Todd S. Purdum, Vanity Fair’s national editor, in the August issue – “It Came from Wasilla” – is a must-read. Despite her disastrous performance in the 2008 election, as Mike Allen reports in Politico, she is still the sexist brand in Republican politics, with a lucrative book contract for her story. But what the charismatic Alaska governor wants America to know about herself does not always match reality.
By election time top McCain aides who tried to work with Palin were barely on speaking terms with her, and some news organizations were reporting that various aides saw her as a “diva” and a “whack” job. It’s a rare look at a hasty and ill-conceived campaign in which soon after the GOP convention began to fall apart and doomed John McCain.
While few campaign sources are directly quoted in the meltdown of the vice-presidential pick it’s doubtful many will dispute Purdum’s account. Barack Obama told aides, the article reports, that it took him months to be a national candidate, and added, “I don’t care how talented she is, this is really a leap.”
Sanford: end is near
This week’s piece by Politico’s Roger Simon which suggested four reasons why the South Carolina governor might still have a political future already needs revision after Sanford’s interview with the Association Press. He says he “crossed lines” with a handful of women other than his mistress – but never had sex with them. I mean, it doesn’t get more Clintonesque than that. Sanford says his Argentine mistress is his soul mate as he tries to fall back in love with his wife. I predicted he’s be gone by the end of July. It will be much sooner.
Read ‘em and weep
“The great paradox of the age is that Barack Obama, the most riveting of recent presidents, is leading us into an era of Congressional dominance. And Congressional governance is a haven for special interest pleading and venal logrolling.” David Brooks, the New York Times columnist, on the balance of power in Washington. [Editor’s note: Ironically, under Bush 43, it was the executive branch which craved absolute power.]
182
Twitter Bytes
Monthly archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
Links
- Calbuzz
- Ron Kaye L.A.
- Cincinnati Beacon
- Talking Points Memo
- Salon
- Andrew Sullivan
- Marc Cooper
- L.A. Observed
- The Angry Anthropologist
- Slate
Syndicate
-
More blogs about joescott3.







-
