State of the Union 2012
26 January 2012 |permalink | email article
THREE of the nation’s leading newspapers had similar reactions to President Obama’s State of the Union speech on Tuesday night—good but still a long way to go with a blue-collar speech aimed at winning over swing voters in November—New York Times: steadily more assertive than 2011, tone sharper, willing to apportion blame and need for more government action; Washington Post: soaring rhetoric, skips over major challenges, less a blueprint of the year to come than why he deserves reelection, sneak preview of second term agenda; Los Angeles Times: argumentative if not aggressive, more successful in achieving first objective than second, overall effective speech. The Party Opposite: House Speaker John Boehner often appeared sleepy while Majority Leader Eric Cantor sometimes applauded vigorously…Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell stared straight ahead, no doubt counting the months to Obama’s defeat…Paul Ryan, the House member bent on destroying Obamacare, seated with four colleagues, at a front row table and visibly angry.
GOP Response
Speaker Boehner and Leader McConnell convinced Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, now the subject of a “Draft Daniels” move to run for president, to deliver what was a pointed and pugnacious response to Obama’s speech. Daniels seized the occasion to slam the president for promoting “pro-poverty” extremism—an odd phrase, and leading a “constant effort to divide us.” That triggered a brief but pointed exchange between two MSNBC hosts, Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews. To Maddow’s surprise, Matthews raved about the speech, saying it displayed “Midwestern conservativism of the best kind.” Maddow’s retort: “I could not disagree with you more.” Matthews said “he also had some solutions.” “No, Maddow murmured.” She was correct.
California Politic
Gov. Jerry Brown, aping Obama, scores with state voters in recommending high earners pay more taxes according to a new Public Policy Institute of California poll on the subject. But about half of likely voters oppose Brown’s welfare cuts, and 75 percent oppose the school cuts he’s threatened if tax increases don’t pass. Only 11 percent of all voters could identify both the top spending category (K-12 schools) and top revenue source (income tax).
Quotable
“How in the world do you, Mitt Romney, justify making more in one day than the medium American family makes in a year—while paying the same tax rate as the guy who scans shoes at the airport?”—Jon Stewart, taking on Romney’s newly released tax returns and low tax rate which adds up to about $57,000 a day.
70
Twitter Bytes
Monthly archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
Links
- Calbuzz
- Ron Kaye L.A.
- Cincinnati Beacon
- Talking Points Memo
- Salon
- Andrew Sullivan
- Marc Cooper
- L.A. Observed
- The Angry Anthropologist
- Slate




