Tax Increase, Small Business Hit?
20 September 2010 |permalink | email article
One of the most heated arguments involving Congress and the Bush administration is over whether to let the Bush tax cuts expire for the wealthy, and how a tax increase would affect hundreds of thousands of small businesses across America – whether new start-ups or mom-and-pop convenience stores. Obama favors tax cuts for most taxpayers but proposes eliminating them for the for the top 2 percent of wage earners, whose taxes would rise.
Grover Norquist, president of the conservative advocacy group Americans for Tax Reform, told The New York Times that “It’s a body blow to the small business community.” That argument endorses the intense lobbying effort to extend the tax break for Americans making over $250,000.
Here’s the shocker: despite the emotional appeal being made Internal Revenue Service stats indicate only 3 percent of small businesses would be subject to the higher tax, suggesting that many studies of previous tax increases suggest that it would have only a minimal impact on hiring.
The Joint Committee on Taxation asserts that 97 percent of all business owners do not earn enough to be subject to the higher rates, which would be levied on income of over $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for families, The Times reported.
With the midterm elections just 44 days away the Democrats will have to step up and move at flank speed to convince voters arguments by trade lobby groups and their Party of NO allies are wrong on the facts.
Quotable
“The Tea Party will be the best thing that’s happened to Barack Obama and the Democrats since, well, Sarah Palin, the media hyped 2008 vice presidential nominee who turned out to be a bursting bumble, not a lasting bubble for the McCain campaign. It’s fitting that Palin is now the godmother of the movement that has captured the GOP instead of being captured by it.” – Democratic strategist Bob Shrum to the Washington Post on whether the Tea Party helps or hurts Obama.
281
Twitter Bytes
Monthly archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
Links
- Calbuzz
- Ron Kaye L.A.
- Cincinnati Beacon
- Talking Points Memo
- Salon
- Andrew Sullivan
- Marc Cooper
- L.A. Observed
- The Angry Anthropologist
- Slate




